|
|
|||||
| Feeding Frenzy League Sites |
| 2009 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2008 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2007 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2006 Feeding Frenzy |
| SAC'D League Sites |
| 2009 SAC'D |
| 2008 SAC'D |
| 2007 SAC'D |
| 2006 SAC'D |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
December 29th, 2010, 03:56 PM
|
#1 |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
 |
IR classification - injury status
Should a player be IR eligible only between the publication of the official NFL injury report (usually Wednesday) and the end of that week's NFL slate of games... or ANYTIME in the course of a season that the aforementioned player was listed as "doubtful/questionable/out"?
Seems we should discuss this one further. Lots of good input in 3 previous valiant attempts to create a poll. Let me throw out potential poll options: 1) Use only current weeks NFL Injury Status report (for teams on Bye week, would be previous weeks report) 2) Use any NFL Injury Status report published since week 1 3) Use current plus the prior weeks NFL Injury Status report for all players, including those on bye week
__________________
What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time  OUT---
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
December 29th, 2010, 04:12 PM
|
#2 |
|
Frenzy and SAC'D
 133x108.png){kind=avatar}
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 17,307
|
Re: IR classification - injury status
I like option 1
Much easier to track |
|
|
|
| Liquid Swords |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Liquid Swords |
|
December 30th, 2010, 05:02 AM
|
#3 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 16,604
|
Re: IR classification - injury status
Definitely don't like #2 option... it's a loophole for stashing players on IR when it's convenient. Does option #3 mean only TWO weeks of injury reports can be used? I'd probably lean towards that.
|
|
|
|
|
December 30th, 2010, 09:04 AM
|
#4 |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
|
Re: IR classification - injury status
Right Jim...2 weeks..the current week plus the prior week for ALL players..option one is only using prior week for players on a bye week.
Anyone else have other options to consider? I just threw these out to begin discussion
__________________
What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time OUT---
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
December 30th, 2010, 02:01 PM
|
#5 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 16,604
|
Re: IR classification - injury status
Then #2 is the way to go, in my mind. I really don't like teams being able to "retro IR" players whenever it's most convenient for their squad. Do it when your player is really injured... or don't do it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Should suspended NFL players be eligible for IR status? - DOES NOT PASS (No!) | Burt the Butcher | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 11 | January 6th, 2011 09:47 PM |
| Cut RB Jerious Norwood ATL (573/2yrs) | Flaxwless | Frenzy Free Agency & the Waiver Wire | 7 | September 3rd, 2009 12:37 PM |
| Move IR ending date to Apr 1 @ 12:00am - Passes 8-1 | Popes | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 12 | March 20th, 2008 02:15 PM |
| IR and cuts | Philadelphia Freedom | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 8 | October 16th, 2007 09:20 AM |
| IR Status Clarification | Burt the Butcher | SAC'D Free Agency & the Waiver Wire | 1 | September 14th, 2007 01:05 PM |
