|
|
|||||
| Feeding Frenzy League Sites |
| 2009 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2008 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2007 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2006 Feeding Frenzy |
| SAC'D League Sites |
| 2009 SAC'D |
| 2008 SAC'D |
| 2007 SAC'D |
| 2006 SAC'D |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
April 20th, 2009, 04:36 PM
|
#1 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
 |
Playoff Expansion - 6 or 4 teams?
Hey guys just wondering thoughts on playoff expansion?
Currently we send 3 division winners and 1 wild card to playoffs. I think it would be great for the league to expand to 6 teams playoffs (3 division winners/3 WC) as it will increase league activity during the year. With more teams able to make the playoffs means there will be more buyers than sellers in the trade market. This means trades to help contenders and the lottery teams. It also will keep owner interest longer if they know they have a chance at playoffs deeper into the year, which indirectly curbs against tanking. The only downside is.... changing the status quo. This is just an informal vote to see if it is worth discussing ways to implement playoff expansion. I would be in favor of playoff expansion to 6 teams AND keeping the the Week 16 championship. This would mean we'd either cut the regular season short 1 game or else we can play a double header (ideally 2 non-division games) for one week.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects - 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion Bay Area Bloodsuckers 2008 SAC'D Champions - 2nd Worst to First in Year! 2011 SAC'D Champions - #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end! |
|
|
|
September 29th, 2009, 08:32 AM
|
#2 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,270
|
Re: Playoff Expansion - 6 or 4 teams?
Looks like we passed expansion in both the Frenzy and SAC'd. I just wanted to make sure that everything is set-up systematically here as it appears Burt had to do some stuff on the SAC'd side.
|
|
|
|
|
September 29th, 2009, 10:21 AM
|
#3 |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
|
Re: Playoff Expansion - 6 or 4 teams?
Yep..let me know if you need help Jim...I needed help from MFL helpdesk..I can dig up my emails on what I had to do if need be....
__________________
What's the point in calling shots His cue ain't straight in line Cue balls made of Styrofoam And no ones got the time  OUT---
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
September 29th, 2009, 01:14 PM
|
#4 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 16,604
|
Re: Playoff Expansion - 6 or 4 teams?
 ... I never even voted on this (don't remember it being posted).So if it has passed... then what needs to take place? I guess we need to change the schedule? "Help me Ob-Burt-won... you're my only hope!" |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Playoff Expansion - 6 or 4 teams? | Flaxwless | SAC'D Rules & Bylaws | 6 | April 23rd, 2009 06:51 PM |
| Revisiting Playoff Expansion + Lottery? | Flaxwless | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 11 | October 31st, 2008 03:40 PM |
| Regular Season FA Closed - Playoff FA open to playoff teams only | Preds | Frenzy Free Agency & the Waiver Wire | 0 | December 7th, 2003 10:00 AM |
| Passed: Number of Playoff teams. | Nittany Dodgers | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 1 | April 9th, 2003 11:44 PM |
| Failed: Adendum to playoff teams poll | Nittany Dodgers | Frenzy Rules & Bylaws | 1 | April 9th, 2003 11:42 PM |
