![]() |
|
|||||
| Feeding Frenzy League Sites |
| 2009 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2008 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2007 Feeding Frenzy |
| 2006 Feeding Frenzy |
| SAC'D League Sites |
| 2009 SAC'D |
| 2008 SAC'D |
| 2007 SAC'D |
| 2006 SAC'D |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
What are the thoughts on how the timing of all this will play out. An early post seemed to have the auction some time soon, and (if it happens) the rookie draft later over the summer. :confused:
I am not particular either way, I just do not want to get caught off guard. EDIT: Most of these other threads seem to be winding down as well, so the time may be soon... |
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#2 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
If there is a rookie draft (or rookie auction), I would say to do that before the vet auction. All that being said, I'll reiterate that I'm not in favor of of a rookie draft or seperate rookie auction! ;) BTW randi, it's good to see your comfort level and posting increase. Get involved, we're a fun group (most the times)! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,270
![]() |
I think this makes sense (including the rookie draft which I am greatly in favor of). I am guessing the auction will be open (not limited by position) which means that it will be somewhat chaotic when the opening bell rings. I can't wait to get this rolling!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
![]() |
Those with experience of doing an auction in this format, how long do you figure it will take?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
I think maybe after this weekend, the rules committee can summarize what we have voted on and see where we stand. It seems like we are pretty close to being ready to roll? |
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#6 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
In the CDL each team nominated 2 players, when one of their players sold they nominated a new player. No more than 24 players were ever being bid upon at any one time. This kept some controls on the insanity and seemed to work well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#9 | |
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
![]() And I like the nominating 2 player, no more than 24 at a time thing. |
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Skippy the One Eyed Beagle
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
as commish having no more than 24 helped alot. it would have gotten insane with more than that.
once the rules are set, i would like a week of prep for the auction or draft if possible. |
|
| Skippy the One Eyed Beagle |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#14 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
I like the 24 player rule. I also favor excluding w/e's as I do not have access to a computer on some weekends (the ones I do not work).
I would estimate a couple of months as well. If each player took 48 hours, it'd be about a month, if my math is right. But that's the ideal. I imagine it will stretch to 2 months, at least. Also, as for the rookie part, what is the advantage of doing that first? In my mind it would make sense to establish a team and then go for the youth, rather than the reverse, but I am open to suggestions as to why it should be different. |
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#15 | |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
Quote:
Also, we have done the rookie draft in the Frenzy right after the NFL draft, before holdouts, injuries, and head cases appear. I can't say for certain this is the exact right way to do it, but that's the way it's been done. You know what they say about old dogs and new tricks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Supreme FF Dominator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Falcon, Colorado
Posts: 19,481
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Burt the Butcher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Burt the Butcher |
|
|
#18 | |
|
PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,210
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Immortal Ramirez |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Immortal Ramirez |
|
|
#19 | ||
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: maybe I should just wait until we figure out we are having a rookie draft, heh? |
||
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#20 | |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
Quote:
The rookie draft is the unknown. Let's look at a small sample. Say you do the veteran auction first, and as you go through you aren't able to snag two starting RBs that you are satisfied with. You then go to the rookie draft, and unless you have one of the first few picks (depending on where some guys land) you won't get one there early. If you do the rookie draft first, you'll know already if you realistically have any rookies that are going to contribute in the near future and can better plan for the more important part of the roster (at least in the short term), the active roster through the veteran auction. I can see reasons for doing both, I just prefer the rookie first. It's not a strong preference, and wouldn't fight too hard if a majority disagreed. It's just the way I'd vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
![]() |
If we are having a separate rookie auction, don't see any reason why should have it first. As for the vet auction, would like to start ealier rather than later so we avoid summer vacations as much as we can.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Feeding Frenzy
Moderator Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maplewood, MN
Posts: 5,204
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 465
![]() |
Hate to be a pain, but inquiring minds what to know:
What still needs to be decided rules wise, scoring, whatever? Can we have a summary of what has been decided? When do we think we will start things? Are we having the vet auction or the rookie draft 1st? |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
SAC'D
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 1,183
![]() |
Quote:
Someone else will have to speak to the rules. There was a lot that was new. |
|
|
|
|
| randilover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randilover |
|
|
#25 |
|
PredsFF.com Portal News Reporters
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,210
![]() |
I was to summarize everything this weekend and...well, it didn't happen.
I know Rookie Draft is first, then the auction will start. not sure about time frames...we need to discuss this. |
|
|
|
| The Immortal Ramirez |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Immortal Ramirez |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|


