Scoring question

[Philadelphia Freedom]

Hi All,

Not that it makes a big difference but I noticed that there seems to be a scoring glitch. For some reason Kennison seems to be getting a point for each reception. However, he is my only WR getting this "bonus". Not sure why 2 of the 3 would be correct and one would be off but I thought I should let you know to make sure that there is not something funky going on.

Eddie Kennison C:4-41 8.1
Jimmy Smith C:3-43 5.8
Reggie Wayne C:8-72 11.2

Thanks,
Matt

[Preds]

Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom

Hi All,

Not that it makes a big difference but I noticed that there seems to be a scoring glitch. For some reason Kennison seems to be getting a point for each reception. However, he is my only WR getting this "bonus". Not sure why 2 of the 3 would be correct and one would be off but I thought I should let you know to make sure that there is not something funky going on.

Eddie Kennison C:4-41 8.1
Jimmy Smith C:3-43 5.8
Reggie Wayne C:8-72 11.2

Thanks,
Matt

Without looking at the stats, my bet is that the extra 2 points comes from Kennison making a tackle after a turnover.

And before you ask, yes, both IOP's and IDP's get credit for stats on either side of the ball.

[Nittany Dodgers]

Matt, it is only .5 pts per reception. However, since all SAC'D players get points for all categories, WRs often gets tackles off of interceptions. I would imagine if you looked at the stats from the game, you would find that Eddie Kennison got a tackle during the game.

[Philadelphia Freedom]

Wow, Brian and Mike were all over that one. I did not think of the tackle thing (since those are not shown for IOP's) but considering the game Trent Green had yesterday that would make sense. Thanks to you both!!

I will verify tonight, but i think that Brian and Mike are correct.

[Preds]

Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom

Wow, Brian and Mike were all over that one. I did not think of the tackle thing (since those are not shown for IOP's) but considering the game Trent Green had yesterday that would make sense. Thanks to you both!!

Y, but I beat Brian with the reply! (one of the only things I won at this past weekend... looking at 0-5 for my fantasy teams).

[Nittany Dodgers]

Originally Posted by Preds

Y, but I beat Brian with the reply! (one of the only things I won at this past weekend... looking at 0-5 for my fantasy teams).

By mere seconds...and I'm looking at 3-0!

And Penn State is looking at a BCS bowl bid!

And the Vikes are 2-0 under Brad Johnson!

Ah yes, everything is as it should be.

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

By mere seconds...and I'm looking at 3-0!

And Penn State is looking at a BCS bowl bid!

And the Vikes are 2-0 under Brad Johnson!

Ah yes, everything is as it should be.

I watched the Vikes win yesterday. I think that game will go down as the definition of "ugly win".

[Nittany Dodgers]

No doubt.

A whopping 6 yards at halftime (they had 21 yards before their final drive in the first half). At one point in the 2nd half, I think they had a 1st and 10 inside the red zone, and ended up punting on a 4th and 35 or something. They just sucked on offense. I can't believe I had Darren Sharper on my bench. Oh, was that killing me.

All I could think of while watching that game is that if I was on the Giant's D I would be pissed.

They played shut down all day.

Vikes looked good on Special Teams and Eli made them look good on defence. He made some real dumb plays.

I also think that the Giants need to play hurry up football more often. I think it takes some of the pressure off Eli. He look pretty good (minus the last INT) in the hurry up.