View Single Post
Old December 10th, 2007, 05:55 PM   #195
Popes
Feeding Frenzy
 
Popes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,052
Popes is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2007 Rules Discussion - Weighted Lottery for the #1 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutts
Why not implement a very straight-forward rule that a team must field a full, active roster unless that team has no empty roster slots or cap room? That's one line added to the rules, easily interpreted. It just doesn't seem hard ... why influence owners beyond that?

We put in a second passage regarding a league vote and severe penalties against obvious tanking, and I think we've gone a long way to solving the problem. I'd rather deal with this thing directly with the offending owners, than build an infrastructure around the problem.
Since your first paragraph deals with much more than late-season tanking, what would be the penalty for breaking this rule? There'd have been a good number of weeks this year where we'd have had infractions. I can remember a week when 6 players (over 5% of the 108 guys we start each week) were started who were guaranteed zeroes, and all the teams starting them had roster spots/cap room to avoid it.

Last edited by Popes; December 10th, 2007 at 06:00 PM.
Popes is offline   Reply With Quote