View Single Post
Old December 10th, 2007, 04:07 PM   #180
Flaxwless
Feeding Frenzy
 
Flaxwless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
Flaxwless is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2007 Rules Discussion - Weighted Lottery for the #1 pick

Quote:
Originally Posted by Popes
I disagree with your premise. In my mind, the toilet bowl and lottery both deal with tanking (i.e. intentionally losing games at the end of the season). The expanded playoffs deals with inattention/inactivity of middle tier teams throughout the season - no one is accused them of tanking. And yes, it might make the bottom-tier teams try harder early in the season, but that is long before tanking ever becomes an issue. I'd like to see the voting as:

Re teams tanking:
1. no change
2. lottery
3. toilet bowl

Re increased competitiveness generally:
1. no change to playoffs
2. expand playoffs to 6

I'd argue the proposal you made above effectively defeats the toilet bowl by matching it up against the seeming support for playoff expansion, when the two are very different and address different issues. Why can't I vote for the two ideas I like (especially when they deal with separate problems, IMO)?
Fine with me, but tanking is not a big issue to risk a Toilet Bowl. It won't take effect for 08, but why should I lose my #1 pick b/c of Joel's tanking (not trying to point fingers). Why should future bad teams suffer?

IMO... it's toilet bowl AGAINST expanded playoffs. Those against a Toilet Bowl are against it b/c it sacrifices the bottom teams. They are not agaisnt it b/c it does not prevent tanking, which it does, but so will expanded playoffs + lottery.

Also if you issue is the bottom teams tanking (ie not setting their best line up) then count me in with Jake and league wide vote would be the best solution.

I could support..

No change.
Expanded playoffs + bottom 3 lottery.
Expanded playoffs + league wide vote on tanking.

Either way for me and I'm sure most of the others in support of playoff expansion it's ether playoff expansion or toilet bowl... not playoff expansion AND toilet bowl.

Any Toilet Bowl, Extra Balls,, or anything that grants draft seeding on WINS... I am against.

I think Jake and Popes would support... PLayoff Expansion + league wide vote on tanking any others?

IMO... seems like Toilet Bowl is losing out.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects
- 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion

Bay Area Bloodsuckers

2008 SAC'D Champions
- 2nd Worst to First in Year!
2011 SAC'D Champions
- #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!

Last edited by Flaxwless; December 10th, 2007 at 04:21 PM.
Flaxwless is offline   Reply With Quote