Re: 2007 Rules Discussion - Weighted Lottery for the #1 pick
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom
I am not sure about splitting the two pieces bu if that is what everyone wants that is fine by me. I would also think that we have to consider that any of these votes has to include the option to leave it as is (nothing like adding yet another option). Could we do this as a bake off? Everyone votes and we take the top 2 options and then we have the final vote?
|
DO NOT SPLIT THEM UP.
The playoffs and lottery were brought up b/c people wanted to change the rookie draft seeding via toilet ball or extra balls etc. To split them up would make it seem like there are 2 different problems, when there is only one... "tanking" (which really isn't a big deal).
I am fine with leaving things status quo... but don't mess with the draft lottery.
If you guys want to solve tanking via messing with the draft seeding... then I will fight until the end for expanded playoffs + bottom 3 lottery. In a contract league, it puts bad teams at a disadvantage.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects
- 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion
Bay Area Bloodsuckers
2008 SAC'D Champions
- 2nd Worst to First in Year!
2011 SAC'D Champions
- #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!
Last edited by Flaxwless; December 10th, 2007 at 01:13 PM.
|