View Single Post
Old December 3rd, 2007, 08:02 PM   #32
Flaxwless
Feeding Frenzy
 
Flaxwless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 6,050
Flaxwless is on a distinguished road
Default Re: 2007 Rules Discussion - Weighted Lottery for the #1 pick

I am not opposed to a weighted lottery. Here's what I would suggest:

It be a lottery between the bottom 3 for the #1 pick w/ picks #2-12 based on record.

Bottom 3 teams lottery

Worst record - 60% chance at #1 overall
2nd worst - 30% chance at #1 overall
3rd worst - 10% chance at #1 overall

A nice simple way to avoid tanking, yet does not ruin league parity through the rookie draft as the worst team can drop no further than #2. Roughly 2 out of 3 times it will keep the 1st pick, with a 40% chance of dropping to #2.

The 2nd worst team has a 1 in 3 chance to move up 1 spot and a 10% shot at moving down 1 spot.

The 3rd worst team will move up 2 spots, 1 out of 10 times or else keep it's spot the other 90% of the time.

It should keep things honest enough to prevent tanking, yet not sigificantly impact the value of high rookie picks for the bottom teams.
__________________
Bay Area Bloodsucking Insects
- 1st EVER Feeding Frenzy Champion

Bay Area Bloodsuckers

2008 SAC'D Champions
- 2nd Worst to First in Year!
2011 SAC'D Champions
- #5 seed, # 2 power rankings, #1 in the end!
Flaxwless is offline   Reply With Quote