Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom
I guess I have two thoughts. Can someone explain what we mean by getting away from the cafeteria style. I thought the idea here was you get points for the players losts and then picks have a certain cost so depending on how many points you have you can purchase the picks that you want?
Also, the only issue that I have with doing the dollar thing to determine the order is this. Say I have three great players. I tender two at the first rounder tender (to achieve the maximum number of points). I then tender the third guy at a fifth round tender. I let all three go and the market forces push all three guys above their tendered levels. The third guy however is way above his tendered value. This means that I have a decent number of points to work with and all I have a lot of dollars so that I can move to the front of the line.
I apologize if this is not making sense but I have only had a little coffee and I know from last year that a couple of RB's (might have been in the SAC'd) were tendered around the fifth round but had pretty decent sale prices.
|
A valid concern, I'd like to hear what others say on that.
I'm thinking we could go by the value of the RFA tenders on players lost (not the sale price) to determine the order, and in the event of a tie, then turn to the difference in selling price from the tender.
That should resolve your concern about under tendering and again keep the order on track for the value of players that are lost.