May 3rd, 2007, 11:03 AM
|
#23
|
|
*****istrator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamburg, NY
Posts: 17,782
|
Re: RFA Compensation Revision Discusion
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers
I'm not sure I follow you here. I don't see how this would remove the potential "value" tenders (I'm not sure I even know how you're defining that), but the higher you tender a player, you're still going to get higher compensation than a lower tender, it's just lower than it is now. Basically, a 3rd round comp isn't even affected by the new system. Just the 1st's primarily.
If we did it based on the final value of the players sold for, we'd totally lose the different tender levels, which I think is a large part of the strategy, and also puts some ownus on the tendering team to assess some amount of value. Otherwise, for a guy on the border between worthy of a 1st or 2nd round tender, there is no risk involved. I think there should be some risk and the tendering team should have a responsibility to set a minimum threshhold for a players value.
|
I spent an hour online late last night chatting with Frank about this, and I STILL don't get what he's saying!
__________________
4x Frenzy Champions (2003, 2005, 2013, 2022*) with 9 appearances in the Frenzy Bowl (4 in the past 5 seasons)
*2022 Co-Champions with WchMeGo Roosters
Email: preds1@gmail.com
Cell: 716-481-8823
|
|
|