Quote:
|
Originally Posted by randilover
I'm not sure we want to invalidate this bid. Isn't this like prosecuting after the law has changed?
If someone really wanted Lang, were they really disuaded by the fact that he was DL, not LB? Again, I have 2 DL's already, so I am basically avoiding most of them, but I would not have bid on Lang either way and would have researched before it was even putting one out there. This needs to be reevaluated for this player, but going forward I would have not problem with it. Of course the bid on the Giants DB will have to he revoked as well if we accept this one.
|
What Giants DB? If there's another mislabel it needs to be voided as well IMO.
I think we should be consistent. Burt had to restart the one auction for starting with an inaccurate bid, same goes for these players. Thus it shouls start from scratch as a valid bid IMO.
Personally, if I see a LB selling for less than 300, I'm taking a MUCH CLOSER look than I would for a DL, so IMO, yes, it does matter.