Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Preds
I advocated 65 in this thread http://predsff.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6287 but got shot down. I probably should have created a 65/32 option. Maybe it would have received some votes that way.
In any case, I'd still support a slight increast to the contract years, from 60 to 65. |
I'd be up for an increase. 65 sounds good.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers
At what point are we going to consider our 2005 rules finalized, and worry about necessary adjustments next season?
|
I would think probably when the rules are "published." Any thoughts on that rule document coming out soon?