Quote:
As for determining a fair order, I really think that if the first two rounds are serpentine, and the 3rd round on is the exact same order as the second round (ie, whoever gets the first pick, picks last in every other round), it balances out. Especially if everyone (read, unanimous) accepts this going in.
I really think it could work.
Edited to add, I could probably have a revised rookie salary scale by the end of the day, with two additional rounds.
|
Brian- not to hold your feet to the fire but did you have any luck with this? Also, are we sure that pick 1.1 is that valuable? If everyone else agrees then I am fine with it but I might suggest that rounds 1, 4, 6 have the same order and than 2, 3 and 5 be the inverse of round 1. Just a thought since I am not sure quite how to value 72 picks over 6 rounds. Thanks!