Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wonder Mutts
I feel this deal should be allowed - if for no other reason than the sanity of the league. As Mike stated, I believe the prohibition against trading RFAs is meant to restrict sign and trade deals. This doesn't violate that spirit. For definition in the future, I think April 1st is a good cut-off point for trading of players tagged as RFAs.
|
I'm sorry I didn't see this earlier, but I agree with Jake's thoughts. My beef was the sign and trade deals. I have no problem with this trade.