[chasmvp19]

No...

I guess I have a hard time believing that even if collusion existed that it is wrong on a won RFA...there are too many owners bidding that it matters...

Now a matched RFA would be something different...does that make sense??? You put him as a RFA because he had value and the bids completed and you decided to keep him...so keep him...

A won RFA player (match declined) is different to me because the original owner is out of the collusion mix and every other owner had a chance to express their desire for said player at whatever cost...

All I can do is express my opinion and put it out there...pass or fail at least I did something other than complain...I hope more owners follow suit - don't just bring us your problems, provide a solution or open a discussion where we can help identify possible solutions...