![]() |
PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
This is a REVISION of my original proposal that would create a Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) composed of the 6 non-playoff teams that will occur after the regular season during weeks 15-17 of the NFL season. This revision puts some curbs in place so that no team can move up or down more than 3 picks. In fact since BYES will be granted to the teams with the 12th and 11th best records. these 2 teams will not drop out of the top 3-4 picks as they can drop no more than 2 slots in the draft.
DSB Seeding will be as follows:
Performance within the DSB will determine Draft Position. By winning the bracket a team can move up no more than 3 draft slots from their original finish. This means the original 6 seed can draft no higher than 3rd overall, the 5th seed no higher than 2nd overall, and seeds 1-4 all will have a shot at the #1 pick. Further, the 2 teams with the worst overall records will be seeded 1 and 2 and given week 15 BYES which setup the following potential finishes for each seed:
To further aid the chances for the bottom teams, week 15 and week 16 matchups will be seeded in reverse order so that the worst team always hosts the next worst seed. For example: DSB Week 1 (NFL week 15)
DSB Week 2 (NFL week 16)
For example in the DSB Week 1 scenario above, the 4 and 5 seeds advanced, thus the 4 seed would face the 1 seed and the 5 seed would face the 2 seed. If seeds 1 and 4 were to win, the losing 2 seed would get the 3rd pick in the draft and the losing 5 seed would get the 4th pick in the draft. DSB Week 3 (NFL week 16)
Once seeding is assigned from the DSB bracket, that seeding will apply to ALL rounds of the draft. |
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
This looks good. Thanks for taking our suggestions to account when drafting this revision.
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
I would have voted yes, if it were limited to the bottom 4 teams. But looks like it is headed in the direction of passing.
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Still need votes from:
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Still need votes from:
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Ramsters have the swing vote on whether this proposal passes or fails.
https://memegenerator.net/img/instan...much-power.jpg https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...wer_Banner.jpg https://i.imgflip.com/26kdn1.jpg |
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Ramsters votes yes, this proposal helps keep teams more engaged I feel.
|
Re: REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
And with Ramsters deciding vote, we have a new post-season format for all teams this season!
All teams will compete either in the Frenzy Championship Playoff Bracket or the Draft Seeding Bracket this post-season. Here's hoping this will work as intended and keep all teams fully engaged throughout the full season! If not, we can revisit in 2023 and adjust or tweak as necessary. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
So reading this, if Seeds 5 and 6 play in final game, who gets pick 1.1?
5 seed would get pick 1.2 and 6 seed gets 1.3 regardless of the outcome. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
or we could have 1 and 2 seeds play week 17 for the top seed, with the winner getting 1 and the loser 4. I'd lean towards 1 and 2 playing for it week 17. Thoughts? |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
I like 1v2 in that scenario.
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
With the 3rd seeded Scorpions win over 5th seeded Killer Bees, thankfully the 5v6 scenario can't happen this year, thus we can clarify the rule to account for a 5v6 scenario with a vote on a rule adjustment in the off-season.
Like Jim, I lean towards the 1v2 week 17 option to play for 1 (loser drops to 4), but am open to other ideas to handle a 5v6 scenario in week 17. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
David, I am not seeing this new rule in the Rule book.
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Let me review and be sure it is in the Frenzy rules..
Note; This rule applies to Frenzy only. I don't think we voted this in for SACd. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
Also, the link in MFL points to old rule book |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
is this just solely for the 1st round (first six picks overall), or does this flow to 2nd-4th rounds? meaning does this set the draft order for all rounds or only the first round with final standings setting rounds 2-4?
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
It sets the draft order. All rounds.
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Ick! Not a fan of that. I'd prefer 1st round only with rounds 2-4 being based on final standings. I'll try to remember to bring that up in off-season vote if others feel the same.
I wasn't a fan of this format anyway but also didn't have any skin in the game until this year. To me it can kind of hurt teams at the end of the season who had bad teams, were riddled by injury, etc. that decide to unload top talent for future picks...at the potential detriment of their own future draft picks if they don't have a competitive team for this draft seeding bracket...turning a potential #1 overall pick into a #3...and trickling down for EVERY round. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
The intent of the DSB is to encourage team sto remain as competitive as possible throughout the regular season, instead of tanking at the end of the season for a higher pick. Teams can still trade out talent, but it's on them to try and continue to field a competitive team. If they don't remain active and make moves to remain competitive, they may well lose higher seeding in the draft as a result.
Keeping all teams as competitive as possible is in the best interests of the league, nothing worse than knowing some teams have just tossed in their chips and are riding on autopilot when you're fighting for positioning and your rivals are facing teams who have thrown in the towel and aren't even trying. They're welcome to do that, but they may well drop in the draft as a penalty for not keeping their rosters competitive. And from my own experiences, I can personally say that teams can still trade studs on 1 year deals and find a way to remain competitive. In down seasons I too have moved stud players and ended up using UFA and waivers to try and remain competitive. I have ended up finding a lot of hidden talent that produces and can yield competitive games and even unexpected wins with active roster management using everything from our TS/PS squads to UFA's and even waivers. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
yeah it definitely screws teams with shitty teams, i dont think most of us don't try and compete all year, so I don't think its needed, the good teams who just miss the playoffs are on average always going to get better picks.
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
It's only 2 spots, up or down, you can move at most. It's not like you go from 1st pick to 6th pick or something that screwy. We did talk about most all of this when we made the rule.
|
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Using this season as an example:
Chickens and Scorpions are set at 6 and 5 due to losses this week. The remaining 4 (Swords, Pirates#3, Freedom#2, and Wolfpack#1) will take the 1-4 draft spots, depending on wins this week and next, with Swaords only able to move up to #3 So when all is done, Chickens and Scorpions slip 1 slot, Swords can move up 2 spots, and at best (or worse) the other three might shift 2 spots. NOTE: Corrected 12/23 |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
Since 1 and 2 start out with the bye, the 1 seed can drop no lower than 3, and the 2 seed can drop no lower than 4. Only the bottom 4 seeds have a shot at the #1 pick. I wouldn't be opposed to DSB only affecting the 1st round. I think that's a reasonable concept. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
GO SWORDS!!! I like the power of picks 1.3, 1.5 and 1.6 |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
Quote:
My frustration really lies with Jefferson and the Vikings. Their second half schedule has been ripe for huge games. I mean HUUUUGE...but the last time Jefferson even topped 10 pts was in week 9 (13.7pts). He was supposed to be QB proof. That's why I made the trade. Anyway...sounds like there is interest in making DSB for 1st round only so I'll put together a proposal and vote. |
Re: PASSES 7-5 - REVISED Proposal - Bottom 6 Draft Seeding Bracket (DSB) for the 1st 6 draft picks
id definitely be for just 1st round adjustment, and exclude rnds 2-4.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2022 - Preds Fantasy Football Forums