![]() |
PS rules discussion
We've voted in a new 5 player PS starting 2017, as well as eligibility for any 3rd or 4th rounder (whether by draft, trade, or waivers on original rookie contract).
I think further rules clarification are necessary on the mechanics of the PS. The current rules state (with voted in 2017 changes in red): Quote:
Quote:
Thoughts? </big> |
Re: PS rules discussion
Personally, I don't like that idea. I would not be in favor for demoting from TS to PS, unless it included a weeks on TS bonus similar to promoting from TS/PS to Active and then demoting back down to TS.
:2cents: |
Re: PS rules discussion
Quote:
I wouldn't be opposed to a salary bump though, may 5-10 cb's per week on TS? I think 25 is too high. I lean towards 5. 1 season on PS would be 17 weeks or a salary bump of 85 cbs. For a developmental player likely on a 100cb contract that's a potential 85% increase in salary to move from TS to PS after 1 season. We might also make the player have to clear waivers if a team wants to demote to PS? |
Re: PS rules discussion
:agree:
|
Re: PS rules discussion
:agree:
I like the idea of clearing waivers is u want to demote. |
Re: PS rules discussion
Good idea on having to clear waivers first. That could make things interesting.
|
Re: PS rules discussion
Would definitely make you think about it before acting..
|
Re: PS rules discussion
So if someone puts in a claim, obviously the team would have option to remove the demotion and keep the player. What if the owning team declined, and let the player go to the claiming team. Would THEY then be able to place them on the PS, since it was waiver claim? Seems like in order to make both sides equal, the player would have to go to TS, and then another waiver period to demote?
|
Re: PS rules discussion
Quote:
|
Re: PS rules discussion
Quote:
With that mechanic in place I don't think the original demoting team shouldn't have or need the right to retract a claim. Thoughts? |
Re: PS rules discussion
So a waiving team can rescind the waiver if they don't want to let the player go ultimately or who they go to??? This is getting into weird territory...this type of waiver then is different than a cut and claim (we call that a waiver too)...so if someone claims my guy I cut, then I can decide to NOT cut him????
|
Re: PS rules discussion
Quote:
I like the idea of a claimed player having to go to active roster by the claiming team, and if the claiming team subsequently cuts said player the original team gets right of first refusal on the player and can reclaim and then demote the player. That's essentially how the PS works for NFL teams. |
Re: PS rules discussion
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2022 - Preds Fantasy Football Forums