Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers

Why does it matter pre-season vs in season?

Just wanting to make sure there is some logic to it vs. just thinking we need some arbitrary deciding line.

Originally Posted by Liquid Swords

With rookies, they haven't played a single game yet. If they are drafted as DB and switch to LB before the season starts, I think the rookie's salary should adjust to the position change salary at that draft position. When the season starts, I think the rookie values should lock at that current position they are slated at.

I'm not talking about vets here.

Originally Posted by Liquid Swords

With rookies, they haven't played a single game yet. If they are drafted as DB and switch to LB before the season starts, I think the rookie's salary should adjust to the position change salary at that draft position. When the season starts, I think the rookie values should lock at that current position they are slated at.

I'm not talking about vets here.

Originally Posted by Philadelphia Freedom

Did we settle this? Is he mine as a DE or back on the market as a LB?

Originally Posted by Preds

IMO. Lang is a clearly a LB (as listed on Clevelands Team website which actually is covered in the rules as Skippy pointed out) and thus has NOT sold as his position was listed inaccurately (an oversight I know, but if Burt's bid of 1.0 instead of 100 is invalid, so is a bid for the wrong position, which can clearly impact a players perceived value).

Not sure what the Rules Committee's feeling is on this, but as Commish, this is how I see it.

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher

so Lang is back in play as a LB for 250?