Pred's Fantasy Football Forums

Pred's Fantasy Football Forums (http://predsff.com/forums//index.php)
-   SAC'D Rules & Bylaws (http://predsff.com/forums//forumdisplay.php?f=89)
-   -   I R (http://predsff.com/forums//showthread.php?t=6307)

randilover April 25th, 2005 02:18 PM

Re: I R
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Burt the Butcher
Please do..I'm tired of voting...

:GoodPost

Preds April 25th, 2005 02:21 PM

Re: I R
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by randilover
:GoodPost

Too bad we won't get much use out of these new smilies... :Sarcasm

Nittany Dodgers April 25th, 2005 03:21 PM

Re: I R
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds
My point is though, like or not, this is a sister to the Frenzy league, and we want to keep as many similarities as possible. We added a few twists (namely IDP's and contract extensions), but as a whole SAC'D is still tied to the Frenzy.

Mike, just so I can disagree with you on something else, it is a rule in the Frenzy that anyone can propose a rule change in the offseason. I would think that since we are in the rule determining stage, anyone could bring anything to a vote that was at least relavant. Since we are adjusting the IR rules to fit the increased roster, I would think a vote on this to be allowed.

Preds April 25th, 2005 03:31 PM

Re: I R
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nittany Dodgers
Mike, just so I can disagree with you on something else, it is a rule in the Frenzy that anyone can propose a rule change in the offseason. I would think that since we are in the rule determining stage, anyone could bring anything to a vote that was at least relavant. Since we are adjusting the IR rules to fit the increased roster, I would think a vote on this to be allowed.

I just don't want to see us stray too far from the core Frenzy ruleset. I'd go so far to say that on the non-IDP rules, we should garner votes from the individual members of both leagues on issues pertaining to the core setup of the rules and apply them universally between the leagues.

Nittany Dodgers April 25th, 2005 03:48 PM

Re: I R
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Preds
I just don't want to see us stray too far from the core Frenzy ruleset. I'd go so far to say that on the non-IDP rules, we should garner votes from the individual members of both leagues on issues pertaining to the core setup of the rules and apply them universally between the leagues.

Really? That seems like a pain. I'd say the sisterhood starts and ends with the fact that we used the Frenzy rules as a foundation, but to have a majority for both leagues agree on rules seems silly. If more people in SACD want to do things one way, but the majority in the Frenzy don't, why not allow the differences? Simplicity?

The Immortal Ramirez April 25th, 2005 04:01 PM

Re: I R
 
I didn't think it would come down to my vote, but it appears it has. I'll put this to rest...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2022 - Preds Fantasy Football Forums