Re: Rule Discussion
 

One other thought. In my local league we subtract defensive scores from the oppositions offensive score. With our scoring in that league we get more realistic socres (or at at least arena football like scores). Might be something to consider trying here .

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Should we start a topic for each item/group of items? Having it all in one thread is going to get crazy.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Seperate breakouts make a lot of sense since their is quite a bit happening here. Thanks!

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Here's the IDP scoring stucture I've used in an IDP league for the past few years:

Punt/Kickoff Return TDs: 6pts
Fumble Recovery/Interception Return TDs: 6pts
Blocked FG/Punt Return TDs: 6pts
Fumble Recoveries: 4pts
Interceptions Caught: 4pts
Blocked FG/Punt: 4pts
Tackles: 1pt
Assists: 0.5pt
QB Sack: 4pts
Safeties: 6pts

Re: Rule Discussion
 

What about pass deflections? Is that counted as an official stat or is that only a video game thing?

Re: Rule Discussion
 

And i dont know if was in this thread or the other... but I owuld be in favor of having an auction for vertans and rookie draft based upon random order or something like that.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

As the newbie I am trying digest things as quickly as I can so for now will add my 2 cents on only a couple things:

- I like the idea of having only 1 yr contracts for the 1st year ... although still have trading and RFAs sounds good.

- I would vote for 6 IDP players in starting lineups ... 2 each of DLs, LBs, DBs ... a flex guy will invariably be a LB, also as there is always an element of luck in FF but this is often even more evident with defensive players than offensive players so prefer to have IDPs as an add on rather than equal footing with offensive players.

- Having a roster size limit is a must but prefer not to have restrictions on offense vs defense.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

first of all, Skippy is right. We need a separate thread for each of these points otherwise we'll never keep things straight.

I played in one with passes deflected. NFL does track that. I say 1/2 point.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Seperate threads is a great idea. Anyone have time to set em up? I can try later, but not at the moment.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I like the limiting of rosters, and if Skippy wants 20 RBs and one of each other position, be my guest (he'll try to trade them off anyway). So, limits of how many IOP & IDP is up in the air...we can vote on it.

I had no problem with the recommended scorings...except maybe add the passes deflected.

auction for vets and random rookie draft is fine (trades can be done for rookie draft). In CDL, we are allowed to throw in next years picks as well, but not two years out.

I agree, you don't want too many IDP, otherwise they take over the scoring.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I'll set them up...but from where?

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Can you post the top 25 scoring and their points from each position so we get an idea of what these scoring rules are like?

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I'm going to advocate an auction for the rookies (or including them in the auction, at least for the IDP's).

We have a solid understanding of IOP values, and rookier salaries that reflect that, but we have no idea what the IDP market will bear.

Seeing as we're talking 1 year contracts year 1, I think it makes the most sense just to throw everyone in the same auction pool (rookies, vets, IOP's, IDP's)

Re: Rule Discussion
 

Just create new threads in the parent forum. Here's a link http://predsff.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=89

Re: Rule Discussion
 

The first post in this thread has a list of topics. Use common sence to combine some that go together.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

NICE... suttle jab there Skip!

Rami's been jabbing at you all day, it's about time you jabbed back!

Re: Rule Discussion
 

grouping rookies in the auction sounds like a solid plan since we are limited to 1 year contracts.

I would like to see passes deflected, since from my small understanding of IDP, CBs are the TE of the DEF.

Also... thinking about it I wouldn't advocate a strict 17500 slary cap using the roughly 600 per player idea. This is b/c I believe teams will value offense more and drive the offensive salaries a bit higher. But as I type this it seems like a moot point since we are starting from the ground up and no market values have been set. Seems like more of an issue if we were to add onto the original Frenzy league.

that's it for now.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I assume you mean subtle.

I have been busy at work, and Rami is easy to ignore.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I thought we all knew my grammar sucked! ;)

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I really shouldn't be the one pointing this out considering how many mistakes I make.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

I haven't seen Jake sign off for a bit. If anyone is missing the postings this afternoon, they are going to crap when they see the new messages. This seriously has been a Frenzy of an afternoon.

Re: Rule Discussion
 

No kidding, I think there are over 300 posts today!

Re: Rule Discussion
 

This is borderline orgasmic! (Sorry, was that PG-13?)